The unfamiliarity of the word

That little fact -- that intelligence is needed for things to progressively evolve -- just happened to be left out when Darwin's evolution was attached to dictionary evolution. We evolve as individuals, society evolves, technology evolves, education evolves, the automobile evolves and agriculture evolves. What a cool theory. I scan the dictionary and decide to call my theory, "possession". In other words, stupid. If he had chosen the word transmutation instead of evolution, things might be entirely different. Our language is filled with words that have departed from their original definitions and are now widely misconstrued and abused. By that I mean biological evolution is not mere change. Here's how that fact has proven useful in helping to make his case. Since everything evolves it is not too much of a leap to accept that life evolved. It is about transmutations in the absence of any intelligent force to make them happen." He could not have chosen a better word. 

 Although transmutation would be a better description of the theory, the unfamiliarity of the word would force people to determine meaning and evaluate that against their own China Fitness Equipment Pads for sale experience. Now when the police show up at your door and take you to court, you just take your dictionary. Evolution is another example of such a word.Please note that evolution normally implies progressive change. But nothing evolves in that sense without intelligent manipulation. You say to the judge, "Looky here judge, the dictionary says possession is to have things and that's all I did. Everyone possesses things and possession is nine tenths of the law. Evolution means change, according to the dictionary, but that does not legitimize any theory of change. In overview (cell to human sense) it is gross change, more like a skipping or gigantic hopping.Specious reasoning and clever crafting of definitions can make about anything appear to come true. Since everything changes, everything can be said to evolve.Most certainly, things do evolve in the dictionary's pre-Darwinian sense of the word. As John Mackay (1852) observed, "When men wish to construct or support a theory, how they torture facts into their service!" Mackay, J. The stuff is possessed. A word was stolen from our vocabulary, a word everyone can agree to. The word and this meaning predated Darwin's concept of biological evolution. 

The case was closed before he ever got into court. (1852). Since nobody has ever seen one type of organism transmutate into another, he would have had a much harder sell.It would be like me coming up with a new theory of commerce. Some words are innocently created to straight forwardly describe a particular thing but can insidiously take on a life all their own.. To the uncritical eye, evolution, taken as being synonymous with change, seems to fit well with what all of us experience every day: Homes get built beginning with simple blocks and 2 X 4s, our bank account balance grows slowly, our bodies begin small and get bigger, babies begin with one cell that multiplies into a whole body and anthills grow one grain of dirt at a time." Do you think the prosecutor might make the argument that you have left out an important part of the definition, namely that to possess something legally requires a mechanism called paying for it? Possession means having something, according to the dictionary, but that does not legitimize any form of possession. 

 How convenient for Darwin's "evolution. Corn kernels get bigger, evolve, because of intelligent horticulture, home architecture evolves because of intelligent engineering, and mathematics evolves because of mathematicians. In the dictionary, evolution's first definition is: the process by which something develops into a different form. My "possession" theory is a process by which one goes into a store, loads up bags and carts with whatever they want and takes it all home. Cleverly then, a new footnote about a whole new mechanism was attached to it without really alerting anyone. In the larger sense, Darwin's evolution requires that species transform into one another (transmutate) all the way up from a single-celled organism. On the other hand, saying that "change" is the same thing as biological evolution makes anyone who does not accept Darwin's evolution, someone who rejects change. The word itself is tendentious, creating in and of itself reason to believe the theory. Examples include truth, religion, supernatural, morality, liberal, capitalism, freedom, love…basically all the hot button words and subjects people consider to be their little sacred domains of private belief and interpretation. Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds